That dang rear rotor. Still needs replacing. Didn’t I read somewhere on here that they warp when removed from the wheels? Anyways, maybe second times a charm.
good luck. have you done any research on this and worked out how you're going to tackle it. obviously you can't just fit the top yolk on it's own without some form of line boring or using the btm ER yolk as well, as the rake angle on the two models are different.I haven't posted for awhile, I figure this would be interesting to document.
Er-5 bars on an EX. I've lurked and I haven't seen any definitive results, so I'm going to try.
sounds interesting. couple of thoughts. when powder coating get it all done at once it's far cheaper. when I had mine done (2015) I asked the cost for the frame. quoted £80. ask how much extra for all the bits doing £10 extra. so took the frame, swing arm, centre stand, brake lever, and every bracket on the bike, (wheels were done already) when I went to pick them he wanted to charge me just the £90 for all if it. I gave him $100 for job well done.
it makes reassembly so much better with it it all coated. and don't reuse any bearings or seals false economy.
2. good luck sounds like a challenge.
Not as difficult as first sounds: Lower fairing 1.4kg; Exhaust change 5-6kg; centre stand off ~2.5kg; passenger foot rests+luggage handles+helmet locks 1kg = 10kg without trying too hard.
3. personally and by general consensus waste of time there is next to no extra power to be had and still keep it reliable best you could do "fog airbox mod" and high flow air filter. reducing back pressure and jet kits do not work so well on the EX cause more trouble than they are worth. you could try and make sure the engine is as good as gets (perhaps degree the cams renew the worn bits clean it up. try and get it as near new HP as possible yours could be down on power.
I'm not going to get into this debate too hard but it is possible, have a former Kawasaki tech (current Ducati tech and shop owner) who used to tune these bikes for racing back in the day, he knows his stuff and this is his recommendation.
How about just reading what I wrote? I'm not building a race bike, I'm not rebuilding and changing engine internals (it's only done 5200miles). The bike had K&N internal airfilter with standard airbox, It has effectively standard twin downpipes with lightweight cans that are more free following (but still baffled), I'm simply adding a proven Dynojet stage 1 re-jetting kit to the carbs to make the most of the air filter and exhaust - engine breathing 101. It should result in smoother midrange and a slightly improved top end. That's it.no debate required "anything is possible" just there is a whole lot of difference between a stock bike that's reliable for 100k and a race bike that's reliable for up to 1k before it needs rebuilding. for every bit of safety margin that's lost reduces the longevity it will run. "been there done that" got the "T" shirt.
Power to weight, two parts to an equation, I'm aiming primarily on the weight side with a tweak on the power side.what I did read was a 10% increase to bring the EX500 and get close to the new R7 pwr to weight. which is also 70ish hp but only 188kgs. with a few little goodies. ok good luck. as for jet kits ask @ducatiman how good they are.
this is a well-trodden path, you would do well to read the forum archives and history of the engine.
the power quoted in the book of 60hp is the top end for a perfect engine in perfect tune which is remarkable for power unit that was designed to be around 45hp this means Kawasaki has tuned this engine to the rowlocks already, most engines are well below this figure. to cut this post short many have claimed extra power gains without major engine work but not one has ever provided dyno evidence to back it up. I'll leave it there.
THE PRIMARY F ING FOCUS IS ON THE WEIGHT REDUCTION!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! WHY SO HUNG UP ON THE MENTION OF PWR????????????????????????yeah ok whatever. theory is one thing in practice is another. I would suggest you get your associate to run it on a dyno first to get base line I think you will be surprised how much you have to work with. then when finish publish the true statistics. as I said earlier this is a well-trodden path. until then Yorkie's out.